alt_rodolphus: (Default)
[personal profile] alt_rodolphus
Working on that report for Hopkirk et al, already logged the details of items #O-428 and #O-431 along with theorised use. Details of items #O-427, #O-429, #O-430, and #O-432 also logged, but left theorised use blank.

But then, as I was shaving a bit ago I did note that my own straight razor (belonged to my father, a charmed piece in the family for years) was much like item #O-429, lacking only the mother-of-pearl inlay. Did any of the above items (excluding #O-428 and #O-431) remind you of things you've used within your own home? Or perhaps your Father's shop?

Now on a less business-as-usual note...

Lana - Good morning.

Date: 2011-06-06 03:13 am (UTC)
alt_lana: (sober)
From: [personal profile] alt_lana
Oh.

Oh, I see.

We might be wrong in supposing that they were practising curse application on random items.

But.

That puts everything in a new light if they meant these items to wind up in pureblood homes. Wealthy pureblood homes. Where such items are commonplace.

As well as servants to use them or assist in their use.

That multiplies the possibilities rather.

We should recheck each of those items to be sure we've caught all they're hiding.

If that straight razor were cursed to

Ugh.

Date: 2011-06-06 03:45 am (UTC)
alt_lana: (considering)
From: [personal profile] alt_lana
Yes. I agree.

And thank you for including me in the full process, allowing me to work through the evidence myself. You didn't have to, but I've learned so much from you in this short span. Only it's going so quickly. I've what, three weeks left?

Profile

alt_rodolphus: (Default)
Rodolphus Lestrange

September 2015

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 08:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios